tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-100877304334917679.post1173890199979287627..comments2011-01-14T15:40:19.480-05:00Shawnhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06287387457304643907noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-100877304334917679.post-38776846951324208872010-03-29T09:18:51.907-04:002010-03-29T09:18:51.907-04:00Nice post brother! WSS / SharePoint Foundation isn&#39;t covered enough by bloggers (IMHO) and I think it is a great departure point for most clients.Frankhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09419241709730011166noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-100877304334917679.post-35738701840633990852009-12-08T08:33:19.408-05:002009-12-08T08:33:19.408-05:00Dennis:<br /><br />Foundation is certainly more capable in web content management (WCM) scenarios than WSS. This is in large part to the way that Foundation treats pages wtithin the tool; they&#39;re all essentially wiki pages. <br /><br />That said, I still wouldn&#39;t use Foundation is you need a good WCM tool. However, if you need an external blog or wiki tool, it&#39;s a decent choice.<br /><br />ShawnShawnhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06287387457304643907noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-100877304334917679.post-86626091338374035532009-12-07T21:03:48.045-05:002009-12-07T21:03:48.045-05:00Seems like SharePoint 2010 Foundation also has much more power as a CMS. Been wanting to explore using Foundation for a public facing site.Dennis Bottjerhttp://www.dennisbottjer.comnoreply@blogger.com